hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3979) Fix hsync and hflush semantics.
Date Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:03:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13466082#comment-13466082
] 

Kan Zhang commented on HDFS-3979:
---------------------------------

bq. I wonder why this was changed?

My guess is HDFS-265 intends to implement API3 rather than API4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-265?focusedCommentId=12710542&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12710542
                
> Fix hsync and hflush semantics.
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3979
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3979
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: data-node, hdfs client
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0, 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
>         Attachments: hdfs-3979-sketch.txt, hdfs-3979-v2.txt
>
>
> See discussion in HDFS-744. The actual sync/flush operation in BlockReceiver is not on
a synchronous path from the DFSClient, hence it is possible that a DN loses data that it has
already acknowledged as persisted to a client.
> Edit: Spelling.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message