hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3597) SNN can fail to start on upgrade
Date Thu, 19 Jul 2012 02:57:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13418015#comment-13418015

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-3597:

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  against trunk revision .

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit

    +1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/2859//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/2859//console

This message is automatically generated.
> SNN can fail to start on upgrade
> --------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-3597
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3597
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Andy Isaacson
>            Assignee: Andy Isaacson
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: hdfs-3597-2.txt, hdfs-3597-3.txt, hdfs-3597-4.txt, hdfs-3597.txt
> When upgrading from 1.x to 2.0.0, the SecondaryNameNode can fail to start up:
> {code}
> 2012-06-16 09:52:33,812 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode:
Exception in doCheckpoint
> java.io.IOException: Inconsistent checkpoint fields.
> LV = -40 namespaceID = 64415959 cTime = 1339813974990 ; clusterId = CID-07a82b97-8d04-4fdd-b3a1-f40650163245
; blockpoolId = BP-1792677198-
> Expecting respectively: -19; 64415959; 0; ; .
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.CheckpointSignature.validateStorageInfo(CheckpointSignature.java:120)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.doCheckpoint(SecondaryNameNode.java:454)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.doWork(SecondaryNameNode.java:334)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode$2.run(SecondaryNameNode.java:301)
> at org.apache.hadoop.security.SecurityUtil.doAsLoginUserOrFatal(SecurityUtil.java:438)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.run(SecondaryNameNode.java:297)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> {code}
> The error check we're hitting came from HDFS-1073, and it's intended to verify that we're
connecting to the correct NN.  But the check is too strict and considers "different metadata
version" to be the same as "different clusterID".
> I believe the check in {{doCheckpoint}} simply needs to explicitly check for and handle
the update case.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message