hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3597) SNN can fail to start on upgrade
Date Wed, 04 Jul 2012 04:11:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406260#comment-13406260

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-3597:

+  public boolean storageVersionMatches(FSImage si) throws IOException {
+    return (layoutVersion == si.getStorage().layoutVersion)
+           && (cTime == si.getStorage().cTime);
+  }

I think this should take {{StorageInfo}} as a parameter instead, and you would pass {{image.getStorage()}}

+    if (checkpointImage.getNamespaceID() != 0 &&
+        sig.storageVersionMatches(checkpointImage)) {
+      // If the image actually has some data and the version matches, make sure
+      // we're talking to the same NN as we did before.
     } else {

I'm not 100% convinced of the logic. I think we should always verify that it's the same NN
-- but just loosen the {{validateStorageInfo}} check here to not check the versioning info.
For example, if I accidentally point my 2NN at the wrong NN, it won't start, even if that
NN happens to be from a different version. It should only blow its local storage away if it's
the same NN (namespace/cluster) but a different version.


+  public void tweakSecondaryNameNodeProperty(String snndir, String prop, String val)

Instead, can you use {{FSImageTestUtil.corruptVersionFile}} here? It seems to do the same
thing -- except it properly closes streams when it's done with them.


+  @Before
+  public void setupCluster() throws IOException {
+  }
+  @After
+  public void teardownCluster() throws IOException {
+  }

No need for these...?


+    cluster = new MiniDFSCluster.Builder(conf).numDataNodes(3).build();

Can you change this test to not need any datanodes? ie instead of writing a file to generate
edits, just do a metadata op like mkdir. Then the test will run faster.

- It seems odd that you print out all of the checkpoint dirs, but then only corrupt the property
in one of them. Shouldn't you be corrupting it in all of them?
- Whenever you start a minicluster, you should have the matching shutdown in a {{finally}}
clause to avoid potentially leaking the cluster between test cases.
- The spelling fix in NNStorage is unrelated. Cleanup's good, but try not to do so in files
that aren't otherwise touched by your patch.

> SNN can fail to start on upgrade
> --------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-3597
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3597
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Andy Isaacson
>            Assignee: Andy Isaacson
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: hdfs-3597.txt
> When upgrading from 1.x to 2.0.0, the SecondaryNameNode can fail to start up:
> {code}
> 2012-06-16 09:52:33,812 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode:
Exception in doCheckpoint
> java.io.IOException: Inconsistent checkpoint fields.
> LV = -40 namespaceID = 64415959 cTime = 1339813974990 ; clusterId = CID-07a82b97-8d04-4fdd-b3a1-f40650163245
; blockpoolId = BP-1792677198-
> Expecting respectively: -19; 64415959; 0; ; .
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.CheckpointSignature.validateStorageInfo(CheckpointSignature.java:120)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.doCheckpoint(SecondaryNameNode.java:454)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.doWork(SecondaryNameNode.java:334)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode$2.run(SecondaryNameNode.java:301)
> at org.apache.hadoop.security.SecurityUtil.doAsLoginUserOrFatal(SecurityUtil.java:438)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.run(SecondaryNameNode.java:297)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> {code}
> The error check we're hitting came from HDFS-1073, and it's intended to verify that we're
connecting to the correct NN.  But the check is too strict and considers "different metadata
version" to be the same as "different clusterID".
> I believe the check in {{doCheckpoint}} simply needs to explicitly check for and handle
the update case.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message