hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3389) Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA.
Date Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:43:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13296135#comment-13296135
] 

Hudson commented on HDFS-3389:
------------------------------

Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #1078 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/1078/])
    Updated CHANGES.txt for HDFS-3408(BKJM : Namenode format fails, if there is no BK root)
And  HDFS-3389(Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA) (Revision 1350733)

     Result = SUCCESS
umamahesh : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1350733
Files : 
* /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/CHANGES.txt

                
> Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3389
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: name-node
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha, 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>             Fix For: 2.0.1-alpha, 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-3389-1.patch, HDFS-3389.diff, HDFS-3389.patch, HDFSHighAvailability.html
>
>
> As per the discussion in HDFS-234, We need clear documentation for BKJM usage in Namenode
HA.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message