hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3389) Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA.
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:28:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293568#comment-13293568
] 

Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-3389:
-------------------------------------------

Thanks a lot Surendra for your verification.

Yes, dfs.ha.namenode.id should be covered in previous sections. Lets file separte JIRA for
that as that will not be under this JIRA scope. This JIRA aims to cover the BK integration
related properties and usage.

Attached the patch by addressing my above comment.
                
> Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3389
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: name-node
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha, 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>         Attachments: HDFS-3389-1.patch, HDFS-3389.diff, HDFS-3389.patch, HDFSHighAvailability.html
>
>
> As per the discussion in HDFS-234, We need clear documentation for BKJM usage in Namenode
HA.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message