Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AD3C975B for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88208 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2012 23:45:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88174 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2012 23:45:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88163 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2012 23:45:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:45:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:45:02 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00F23A469C for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:44:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <764999414.8092.1334879082799.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <534697404.5304.1319298572146.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-2492) BlockManager cross-rack replication checks only work for ScriptBasedMapping MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13257913#comment-13257913 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-2492: --------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523415/HDFS-2492.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 eclipse:eclipse. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed unit tests in . +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/2305//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/2305//console This message is automatically generated. > BlockManager cross-rack replication checks only work for ScriptBasedMapping > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-2492 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2492 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 2.0.0, 3.0.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.0.0, 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-2492-blockmanager.patch, HDFS-2492-blockmanager.patch, HDFS-2492-blockmanager.patch, HDFS-2492-blockmanager.patch, HDFS-2492-blockmanager.patch, HDFS-2492-blockmanager.patch, HDFS-2492.patch > > > The BlockManager cross-rack replication checks only works if script files are used for replication, not if alternate plugins provide the topology information. > This is because the BlockManager sets its rack checking flag if there is a filename key > {code} > shouldCheckForEnoughRacks = conf.get(DFSConfigKeys.NET_TOPOLOGY_SCRIPT_FILE_NAME_KEY) != null; > {code} > yet this filename key is only used if the topology mapper defined by > {code} > DFSConfigKeys.NET_TOPOLOGY_NODE_SWITCH_MAPPING_IMPL_KEY > {code} > is an instance of {{ScriptBasedMapping}} > If any other mapper is used, the system may be multi rack, but the Block Manager will not be aware of this fact unless the filename key is set to something non-null -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira