hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eli Collins (Created) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (HDFS-3044) fsck move should be non-destructive by default
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:45:58 GMT
fsck move should be non-destructive by default

                 Key: HDFS-3044
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3044
             Project: Hadoop HDFS
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: name-node
            Reporter: Eli Collins
            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe

The fsck move behavior in the code and originally articulated in HADOOP-101 is:

{quote}Current failure modes for DFS involve blocks that are completely missing. The only
way to "fix" them would be to recover chains of blocks and put them into lost+found{quote}

A directory is created with the file name, the blocks that are accessible are created as individual
files in this directory, then the original file is removed. 

I suspect the rationale for this behavior was that you can't use files that are missing locations,
and copying the block as files at least makes part of the files accessible. However this behavior
can also result in permanent dataloss. Eg:
- Some datanodes don't come up (eg due to a HW issues) and checkin on cluster startup, files
with blocks where all replicas are on these set of datanodes are marked corrupt
- Admin does fsck move, which deletes the "corrupt" files, saves whatever blocks were available
- The HW issues with datanodes are resolved, they are started and join the cluster. The NN
tells them to delete their blocks for the corrupt files since the file was deleted. 

I think we should:
- Make fsck move non-destructive by default (eg just does a move into lost+found)
- Make the destructive behavior optional (eg "--destructive" so admins think about what they're
- Provide better sanity checks and warnings, eg if you're running fsck and not all the slaves
have checked in (if using dfs.hosts) then fsck should print a warning indicating this that
an admin should have to override if they want to do something destructive

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message