hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron T. Myers (Resolved) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-2602) NN should log newly-allocated blocks without losing BlockInfo
Date Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:21:30 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Aaron T. Myers resolved HDFS-2602.
----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: HA branch (HDFS-1623)
     Hadoop Flags: Reviewed

Thanks a lot for your many reviews, Todd. I've just committed this to the HA branch.
                
> NN should log newly-allocated blocks without losing BlockInfo
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-2602
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2602
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ha
>    Affects Versions: HA branch (HDFS-1623)
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: HA branch (HDFS-1623)
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-2602.patch, HDFS-2602.patch, HDFS-2602.patch, HDFS-2602.patch,
HDFS-2602.patch
>
>
> Without the patch in HDFS-1108, new block allocations aren't logged to the edits log.
For HA, we'll need that functionality and we'll need to make sure that block locations aren't
blown away in the Standby NN when tailing the edits log.
> As described in HDFS-1975:
> When we close a file, or add another block to a file, we write OP_CLOSE or OP_ADD in
the txn log. FSEditLogLoader, when it sees these types of transactions, creates new BlockInfo
objects for all of the blocks listed in the transaction. These new BlockInfos have no block
locations associated. So, when we close a file, the SBNN loses its block locations info for
that file and is no longer "hot".
> I have an ugly hack which copies over the old BlockInfos from the existing INode, but
I'm not convinced it's the right way. It might be cleaner to add new opcode types like OP_ADD_ADDITIONAL_BLOCK,
and actually treat OP_CLOSE as just a finalization of INodeFileUnderConstruction to INodeFile,
rather than replacing block info at all.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message