Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAF9673F1 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2969 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2011 12:11:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2917 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2011 12:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2899 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2011 12:11:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:11:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2001.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:11:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD5B4D123 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:10:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (Commented) (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <614033527.20890.1321013452836.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <806323341.16371.1320892671611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-2547) Design doc is wrong about default block placement policy. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13148445#comment-13148445 ] Harsh J commented on HDFS-2547: ------------------------------- Aaron, {{BlockPlacementPolicyDefault}} has proper comments in it, on trunk. It was 0.20's ReplicationTargetChooser that threw me off there. Reopening to fix against 0.20. > Design doc is wrong about default block placement policy. > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-2547 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2547 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: name-node > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.24.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-2547.patch > > > bq. For the common case, when the replication factor is three, HDFS's placement policy is to put one replica on one node in the local rack, another on a node in a different (remote) rack, and the last on a different node in the same *remote* rack. > Should actually be: "and the last on a different node in the same *local* rack." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira