hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-2231) Configuration changes for HA namenode
Date Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:53:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13082822#comment-13082822

Allen Wittenauer commented on HDFS-2231:

I don't think I took it out of context. You specifically said:

bq. That second scheme is not to use failover. In such a case, clients need to know about
where the active is running. Datanodes needs to know about where both active and standby is

I read this as "something which is not failover has an active and a standby that a client
cares about"....which makes no sense.    If a client cares about the active server, it is
using a failover architecture, no matter how it is painted.

> Configuration changes for HA namenode
> -------------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-2231
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2231
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
>            Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
>             Fix For: HA branch (HDFS-1623)
> This jira tracks the changes required for configuring HA setup for namenodes.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message