Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72881 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2011 21:18:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 21:18:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 84492 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 21:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84459 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 21:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84451 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 21:18:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:18:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:18:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C483A03BD for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:18:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2040660019.56205.1302729486112.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1154777554.44805.1302292745765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1822) Editlog opcodes overlap between 20 security and later releases MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13019558#comment-13019558 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HDFS-1822: ---------------------------------------- bq. the new software can handle the old edit logs since opcodes are private unstable APIs You can't have it both ways. If new software understands the old opcodes that essentially declares them stable. bq. I believe my approach avoids opcode conversion in downstream releases. Won't the editslog still need to get processed during an upgrade? > Editlog opcodes overlap between 20 security and later releases > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-1822 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1822 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: name-node > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1822.patch > > > Same opcode are used for different operations between 0.20.security, 0.22 and 0.23. This results in failure to load editlogs on later release, especially during upgrades. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira