hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1814) HDFS portion of HADOOP-7214 - Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent
Date Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:16:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13017289#comment-13017289
] 

Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-1814:
--------------------------------------

bq. Should a configuration be passed to getGroupsMappingService()?

I'm afraid I don't follow. Why would this be necessary or desirable?

bq. On a side note, I've been troubled by FsShell (in common) having tests in hdfs. It creates
an entanglement of jira cross-dependencies. I'd suggest adding unit tests for the namenode
in hdfs, and adding the functional tests of FsShell to common.

I totally agree that we should tease these apart. Can we file this as a separate issue, though?

> HDFS portion of HADOOP-7214 - Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1814
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1814
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: hdfs client, name-node
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.0
>            Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
>            Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
>         Attachments: hdfs-1814.0.txt
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message