hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HDFS-1822) Editlog opcodes overlap between 20 security and later releases
Date Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:05:06 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13018540#comment-13018540
] 

Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HDFS-1822:
----------------------------------------------

> Oh, and just so it is official: -1.

Hi Allen, could you provide an alternative proposal or a detailed explanation?  It is not
clear to me although I have some clue from your previous comments.

Below is quoted from the "Decision Making" section in http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#meritocracy

{quote}
  -1 -- a negative vote

The rules require that a negative vote includes an alternative proposal or a detailed explanation
of the reasons for the negative vote.
{quote}

> Editlog opcodes overlap between 20 security and later releases
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1822
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1822
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: name-node
>    Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0
>            Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
>            Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-1822.patch
>
>
> Same opcode are used for different operations between 0.20.security, 0.22 and 0.23. This
results in failure to load editlogs on later release, especially during upgrades.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message