hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HDFS-900) Corrupt replicas are not tracked correctly through block report from DN
Date Fri, 04 Feb 2011 04:00:23 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12990446#comment-12990446

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-900:

test failures:
TestFileConcurrentReader - HDFS-1401
TestStorageRestore - HDFS-1496

test-patch results:
     [exec] -1 overall.  
     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec]     -1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
     [exec]                         Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
     [exec]                         Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify
this patch.
     [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
     [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler
     [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9)
     [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
     [exec]     +1 system test framework.  The patch passed system test framework compile.
     [exec] ======================================================================
Testing of this patch have dome manually and using Todd's utility attached above.

> Corrupt replicas are not tracked correctly through block report from DN
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-900
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>         Attachments: log-commented, reportCorruptBlock.patch, to-reproduce.patch
> This one is tough to describe, but essentially the following order of events is seen
to occur:
> # A client marks one replica of a block to be corrupt by telling the NN about it
> # Replication is then scheduled to make a new replica of this node
> # The replication completes, such that there are now 3 good replicas and 1 corrupt replica
> # The DN holding the corrupt replica sends a block report. Rather than telling this DN
to delete the node, the NN instead marks this as a new *good* replica of the block, and schedules
deletion on one of the good replicas.
> I don't know if this is a dataloss bug in the case of 1 corrupt replica with dfs.replication=2,
but it seems feasible. I will attach a debug log with some commentary marked by '============>',
plus a unit test patch which I can get to reproduce this behavior reliably. (it's not a proper
unit test, just some edits to an existing one to show it)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message