Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84655 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2010 23:15:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2010 23:15:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 28807 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 23:15:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28692 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 23:15:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28684 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2010 23:15:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:15:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:15:39 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAQNFIE6025837 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:15:19 GMT Message-ID: <17627838.328931290813318651.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:15:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Thanh Do (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HDFS-1218) 20 append: Blocks recovered on startup should be treated with lower priority during block synchronization MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12936122#action_12936122 ] Thanh Do commented on HDFS-1218: -------------------------------- Todd, is this similar to HDFS-1103? will the problem goes away if we don't take the replica at the reboot node in the recovery target? I.e., we only take RBW replicas into lease recovery, but not RWR? > 20 append: Blocks recovered on startup should be treated with lower priority during block synchronization > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-1218 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1218 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: data-node > Affects Versions: 0.20-append > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.20-append > > Attachments: hdfs-1281.txt > > > When a datanode experiences power loss, it can come back up with truncated replicas (due to local FS journal replay). Those replicas should not be allowed to truncate the block during block synchronization if there are other replicas from DNs that have _not_ restarted. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.