hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eli Collins (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HDFS-1377) Quota bug for partial blocks allows quotas to be violated
Date Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:11:17 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Eli Collins updated HDFS-1377:

    Attachment: hdfs-1377-b20-3.patch

Patch for branch 20 attached.  Address Raghu's feedback.    All test pass modulo TestDU which
is HADOOP-7045. Think patch is ready to be checked in. 

     [exec] -1 overall.  
     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests.
     [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
     [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler
     [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
     [exec]     -1 Eclipse classpath. The patch causes the Eclipse classpath to differ from
the contents of the lib directories.

Not sure what the eclipse classpath warning is about, this patch just edits some source files.

> Quota bug for partial blocks allows quotas to be violated 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-1377
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1377
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: name-node
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0
>            Reporter: Eli Collins
>            Assignee: Eli Collins
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0
>         Attachments: hdfs-1377-b20-1.patch, hdfs-1377-b20-2.patch, hdfs-1377-b20-3.patch,
> There's a bug in the quota code that causes them not to be respected when a file is not
an exact multiple of the block size. Here's an example:
> {code}
> $ hadoop fs -mkdir /test
> $ hadoop dfsadmin -setSpaceQuota 384M /test
> $ ls dir/ | wc -l   # dir contains 101 files
> 101
> $ du -ms dir        # each is 3mb
> 304	dir
> $ hadoop fs -put dir /test
> $ hadoop fs -count -q /test
>         none             inf       402653184      -550502400            2          101
         317718528 hdfs://haus01.sf.cloudera.com:10020/test
> $ hadoop fs -stat "%o %r" /test/dir/f30
> 134217728 3    # three 128mb blocks
> {code}
> INodeDirectoryWithQuota caches the number of bytes consumed by it's children in {{diskspace}}.
The quota adjustment code has a bug that causes {{diskspace}} to get updated incorrectly when
a file is not an exact multiple of the block size (the value ends up being negative). 
> This causes the quota checking code to think that the files in the directory consumes
less space than they actually do, so the verifyQuota does not throw a QuotaExceededException
even when the directory is over quota. However the bug isn't visible to users because {{fs
count -q}} reports the numbers generated by INode#getContentSummary which adds up the sizes
of the blocks rather than use the cached INodeDirectoryWithQuota#diskspace value.
> In FSDirectory#addBlock the disk space consumed is set conservatively to the full block
size * the number of replicas:
> {code}
> updateCount(inodes, inodes.length-1, 0,
>     fileNode.getPreferredBlockSize()*fileNode.getReplication(), true);
> {code}
> In FSNameSystem#addStoredBlock we adjust for this conservative estimate by subtracting
out the difference between the conservative estimate and what the number of bytes actually
stored was:
> {code}
> //Updated space consumed if required.
> INodeFile file = (storedBlock != null) ? storedBlock.getINode() : null;
> long diff = (file == null) ? 0 :
>     (file.getPreferredBlockSize() - storedBlock.getNumBytes());
> if (diff > 0 && file.isUnderConstruction() &&
>     cursize < storedBlock.getNumBytes()) {
> ...
>     dir.updateSpaceConsumed(path, 0, -diff*file.getReplication());
> {code}
> We do the same in FSDirectory#replaceNode when completing the file, but at a file granularity
(I believe the intent here is to correct for the cases when there's a failure replicating
blocks and recovery). Since oldnode is under construction INodeFile#diskspaceConsumed will
use the preferred block size  (vs of Block#getNumBytes used by newnode) so we will again subtract
out the difference between the full block size and what the number of bytes actually stored
> {code}
> long dsOld = oldnode.diskspaceConsumed();
> ...
> //check if disk space needs to be updated.
> long dsNew = 0;
> if (updateDiskspace && (dsNew = newnode.diskspaceConsumed()) != dsOld) {
>   try {
>     updateSpaceConsumed(path, 0, dsNew-dsOld);
> ...
> {code}
> So in the above example we started with diskspace at 384mb (3 * 128mb) and then we subtract
375mb (to reflect only 9mb raw was actually used) twice so for each file the diskspace for
the directory is - 366mb (384mb minus 2 * 375mb). Which is why the quota gets negative and
yet we can still write more files.
> So a directory with lots of single block files (if you have multiple blocks on the final
partial block ends up subtracting from the diskspace used) ends up having a quota that's way
> I think the fix is to in FSDirectory#replaceNode not have the diskspaceConsumed calculations
differ when the old and new INode have the same blocks. I'll work on a patch which also adds
a quota test for blocks that are not multiples of the block size and warns in INodeDirectory#computeContentSummary
if the computed size does not reflect the cached value.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message