hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HDFS-320) Namenode should return lease recovery request with other requests
Date Sun, 08 Aug 2010 00:28:16 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Jakob Homan updated HDFS-320:
-----------------------------

    Status: Open  (was: Patch Available)

Canceling patch pending further discussion.  I tend to agree with Hairong; we should be very
cautious about modifying the heartbeats.  In particular, this patch makes a change with an
immediate need and doesn't provide any immediate benefit or tests.  It's been a while, Kan,
do you still need this change?

> Namenode should return lease recovery request with other requests
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-320
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-320
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kan Zhang
>            Assignee: Kan Zhang
>         Attachments: HADOOP-5481.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-5034 modified NN to return both replication and deletion requests to DN in one
reply to a heartbeat. However, the lease recovery request is still sent separately by itself.
Is there a reason for this? If not, I suggest we combine them together. This will make it
less confusing when adding new types of requests, which are combinable as well.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message