Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <437753470.565651269908247381.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:17:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HDFS-985) HDFS should issue multiple RPCs for
 listing a large directory
In-Reply-To: <891015207.349171266457048005.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851173#action_12851173 ] 

Hairong Kuang commented on HDFS-985:
------------------------------------

Hi Dhruba! Yes the data are good! I was very concerned that the feature would cause a lot of performance degradation. Directory listing is indeed very CPU intensive at NN. 

> HDFS should issue multiple RPCs for listing a large directory
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-985
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-985
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Hairong Kuang
>            Assignee: Hairong Kuang
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: directoryBrowse_0.20yahoo.patch, directoryBrowse_0.20yahoo_1.patch, directoryBrowse_0.20yahoo_2.patch, iterativeLS_trunk.patch, iterativeLS_trunk1.patch, iterativeLS_trunk2.patch, iterativeLS_trunk3.patch, iterativeLS_trunk3.patch, iterativeLS_trunk4.patch, iterativeLS_yahoo.patch, iterativeLS_yahoo1.patch, testFileStatus.patch
>
>
> Currently HDFS issues one RPC from the client to the NameNode for listing a directory. However some directories are large that contain thousands or millions of items. Listing such large directories in one RPC has a few shortcomings:
> 1. The list operation holds the global fsnamesystem lock for a long time thus blocking other requests. If a large number (like thousands) of such list requests hit NameNode in a short period of time, NameNode will be significantly slowed down. Users end up noticing longer response time or lost connections to NameNode.
> 2. The response message is uncontrollable big. We observed a response as big as 50M bytes when listing a directory of 300 thousand items. Even with the optimization introduced at HDFS-946 that may be able to cut the response by 20-50%, the response size will still in the magnitude of 10 mega bytes.
> I propose to implement a directory listing using multiple RPCs. Here is the plan:
> 1. Each getListing RPC has an upper limit on the number of items returned.  This limit could be configurable, but I am thinking to set it to be a fixed number like 500.
> 2. Each RPC additionally specifies a start position for this listing request. I am thinking to use the last item of the previous listing RPC as an indicator. Since NameNode stores all items in a directory as a sorted array, NameNode uses the last item to locate the start item of this listing even if the last item is deleted in between these two consecutive calls. This has the advantage of avoid duplicate entries at the client side.
> 3. The return value additionally specifies if the whole directory is done listing. If the client sees a false flag, it will continue to issue another RPC.
> This proposal will change the semantics of large directory listing in a sense that listing is no longer an atomic operation if a directory's content is changing while the listing operation is in progress.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.