hadoop-hdfs-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HDFS-1001) DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK
Date Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:21:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840292#action_12840292

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1001:

Hey bc,
I think there may be a small error in the test. In testCompletePartialRead, you spy on the
blockScanner, but don't assign the spy back into this.getDataNode() - thus the verifiedByClient
call won't go through the spy object and the test will always pass (at least by my understanding
of how mockito works). I think you need to do:

DataBlockScanner scanner = spy(this.getDataNode().blockScanner);
this.getDatanode().blockScanner = scanner;

Can you verify that the test fails properly if the change to the code is reverted?

> DataXceiver and BlockReader disagree on when to send/recv CHECKSUM_OK
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-1001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1001
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0
>            Reporter: bc Wong
>            Assignee: bc Wong
>         Attachments: HDFS-1001.patch
> Running the TestPread with additional debug statements reveals that the BlockReader sends
CHECKSUM_OK when the DataXceiver doesn't expect it. Currently it doesn't matter since DataXceiver
closes the connection after each op, and CHECKSUM_OK is the last thing on the wire. But if
we want to cache connections, they need to agree on the exchange of CHECKSUM_OK.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message