Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <1724439057.300591263753114543.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:31:54 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Cosmin Lehene (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (HDFS-630) In
 DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(), the client can exclude specific
 datanodes when locating the next block.
In-Reply-To: <794054798.1253257617910.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Cosmin Lehene updated HDFS-630:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-0.21-svn-2.patch

attaching 0.21 patch with javadoc link fixed

> In DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(), the client can exclude specific datanodes when locating the next block.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-630
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-630
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hdfs client, name-node
>    Affects Versions: 0.21.0
>            Reporter: Ruyue Ma
>            Assignee: Cosmin Lehene
>         Attachments: 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-0.21-svn-1.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-0.21-svn-2.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-0.21-svn.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-for-0.21-and-trunk-unified.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-for-0.21.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-svn.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-svn.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-1.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-2.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-3.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-3.patch, hdfs-630-0.20.txt, HDFS-630.patch
>
>
> created from hdfs-200.
> If during a write, the dfsclient sees that a block replica location for a newly allocated block is not-connectable, it re-requests the NN to get a fresh set of replica locations of the block. It tries this dfs.client.block.write.retries times (default 3), sleeping 6 seconds between each retry ( see DFSClient.nextBlockOutputStream).
> This setting works well when you have a reasonable size cluster; if u have few datanodes in the cluster, every retry maybe pick the dead-datanode and the above logic bails out.
> Our solution: when getting block location from namenode, we give nn the excluded datanodes. The list of dead datanodes is only for one block allocation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.