Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69026 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2009 04:28:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2009 04:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 85300 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2009 04:28:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85132 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2009 04:28:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85109 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2009 04:28:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:28:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:28:39 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA5B234C4C4 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:28:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <420440396.1261024098238.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:28:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HDFS-101) DFS write pipeline : DFSClient sometimes does not detect second datanode failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HDFS-101: ------------------------------- Attachment: detectDownDN.patch A patch for review. This patch does not include any test. I will post the tests at HDFS-564. > DFS write pipeline : DFSClient sometimes does not detect second datanode failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-101 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-101 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Raghu Angadi > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: detectDownDN.patch > > > When the first datanode's write to second datanode fails or times out DFSClient ends up marking first datanode as the bad one and removes it from the pipeline. Similar problem exists on DataNode as well and it is fixed in HADOOP-3339. From HADOOP-3339 : > "The main issue is that BlockReceiver thread (and DataStreamer in the case of DFSClient) interrupt() the 'responder' thread. But interrupting is a pretty coarse control. We don't know what state the responder is in and interrupting has different effects depending on responder state. To fix this properly we need to redesign how we handle these interactions." > When the first datanode closes its socket from DFSClient, DFSClient should properly read all the data left in the socket.. Also, DataNode's closing of the socket should not result in a TCP reset, otherwise I think DFSClient will not be able to read from the socket. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.