Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD030200CD8 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CBC2816A05D; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id EB09716A058 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 20:06:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 85142 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2017 18:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84403 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2017 18:06:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:06:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5EC4D1806C7 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:06:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -12.705 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.705 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=1.596, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yahoo-inc.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aE0hAWTWpFGN for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sonic323-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic323-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.190.84]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1E7E3618A4 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:06:46 +0000 (UTC) X-YMail-OSG: 0tR8EAMVM1mli25Ci.2Dqm1p.fLBkIMz1.aAxlcT4lwNtIc9.FVJL.9BOrQvE8X IOrmexWvZujde6obBz_TuywhKovkiWDFIgUEHzofqWBV3iuPr88uHLToz74RwZL5BlKRHFD6_53S 52bNQJuUbFHATBJacz3vTctF9x_LN49sVV10s4kV2eRzf0blaXEOpshDdzxsIX0Kfq3tKQBpF9w7 HOLamwJq5ILERB74GBXvH7R134hbroT9iDA52p72FPmPVE2mOXVlFRsIg7UcVTJqO Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic323.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:06:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:05:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Eric Badger Reply-To: Eric Badger To: Chris Douglas , Zhe Zhang Cc: Konstantin Shvachko , Andrew Wang , Allen Wittenauer , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Message-ID: <1743130821.440302.1501697140531@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <8AD4EE147886274A8B495D6AF407DF698FCB02DE@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <9CE1FB4F-7424-4DEB-B050-6846DE1CC1B7@effectivemachines.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.4 (RC0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.10181 YahooMailNeo Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/59.0.3071.115 Safari/537.36 archived-at: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:06:55 -0000 - Verified all checksums signatures - Built from src on macOS 10.12.6 with Java 1.8.0u65 - Deployed single node pseudo cluster - Successfully ran sleep and pi jobs - Navigated the various UIs +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Eric On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:31 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Zhe Zhang wrote: > Quick question for Chris: was your +1 for the RC, or to support > Konstantin's statement regarding packaging? For Konstantin's statement. I haven't had a chance to look through the RC yet, but it's on my list. -C > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:56 PM Chris Douglas wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> wrote: >> > For the packaging, here is the exact phrasing from the sited >> release-policy >> > document relevant to binaries: >> > "As a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to >> > build a compiled version of the source, binary/bytecode packages MAY be >> > distributed alongside official Apache releases. In all such cases, the >> > binary/bytecode package MUST have the same version number as the source >> > release and MUST only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of >> > compiling that version of the source code release and its dependencies." >> > I don't think my binary package violates any of these. >> >> +1 The PMC VOTE applies to source code, only. If someone wants to >> rebuild the binary tarball with native libs and replace this one, >> that's fine. >> >> My reading of the above is that source code must be distributed with >> binaries, not that we omit the source code from binary releases... -C >> >> > But I'll upload an additional tar.gz with native bits and no src, as you >> > guys requested. >> > Will keep it as RC0 as there is no source code change and it comes from >> the >> > same build. >> > Hope this is satisfactory. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > --Konstantin >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Wang >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I agree with Brahma on the two issues flagged (having src in the binary >> >> tarball, missing native libs). These are regressions from prior >> releases. >> >> >> >> As an aside, "we release binaries as a convenience" doesn't relax the >> >> quality bar. The binaries are linked on our website and distributed >> through >> >> official Apache channels. They have to adhere to Apache release >> >> requirements. And, most users consume our work via Maven dependencies, >> >> which are binary artifacts. >> >> >> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html goes into this in more >> >> detail. A release must minimally include source packages, and can also >> >> include binary artifacts. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Andrew >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko < >> >> shv.hadoop@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> To avoid any confusion in this regard. I built RC0 manually in >> compliance >> >>> with Apache release policy >> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html >> >>> I edited the HowToReleasePreDSBCR page to make sure people don't use >> >>> Jenkins option for building. >> >>> >> >>> A side note. This particular build is broken anyways, so no worries >> there. >> >>> I think though it would be useful to have it working for testing and >> as a >> >>> packaging standard. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> --Konstantin >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Allen Wittenauer < >> >>> aw@effectivemachines.com >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > > On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Konstantin Shvachko < >> >>> shv.hadoop@gmail.com> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePreDSBCR >> >>> > >> >>> > FYI: >> >>> > >> >>> > If you are using ASF Jenkins to create an ASF release >> >>> > artifact, it's pretty much an automatic vote failure as any such >> >>> release is >> >>> > in violation of ASF policy. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org >> >> -- > Zhe Zhang > Apache Hadoop Committer > http://zhe-thoughts.github.io/about/ | @oldcap --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org