hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edwina Lu <e...@linkedin.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.4 (RC0)
Date Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:36:05 GMT
+1 (non-binding). 

Thanks,

Edwina

On 7/31/17, 6:57 PM, "Konstantin Shvachko" <shv.hadoop@gmail.com> wrote:

    Uploaded new binaries hadoop-2.7.4-RC0.tar.gz, which adds lib/native/.
    Same place: http://home.apache.org/~shv/hadoop-2.7.4-RC0/
    
    Thanks,
    --Konstantin
    
    On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Chris Douglas <cdouglas@apache.org> wrote:
    
    > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
    > <shv.hadoop@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > For the packaging, here is the exact phrasing from the sited
    > release-policy
    > > document relevant to binaries:
    > > "As a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to
    > > build a compiled version of the source, binary/bytecode packages MAY be
    > > distributed alongside official Apache releases. In all such cases, the
    > > binary/bytecode package MUST have the same version number as the source
    > > release and MUST only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of
    > > compiling that version of the source code release and its dependencies."
    > > I don't think my binary package violates any of these.
    >
    > +1 The PMC VOTE applies to source code, only. If someone wants to
    > rebuild the binary tarball with native libs and replace this one,
    > that's fine.
    >
    > My reading of the above is that source code must be distributed with
    > binaries, not that we omit the source code from binary releases... -C
    >
    > > But I'll upload an additional tar.gz with native bits and no src, as you
    > > guys requested.
    > > Will keep it as RC0 as there is no source code change and it comes from
    > the
    > > same build.
    > > Hope this is satisfactory.
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > --Konstantin
    > >
    > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > >> I agree with Brahma on the two issues flagged (having src in the binary
    > >> tarball, missing native libs). These are regressions from prior
    > releases.
    > >>
    > >> As an aside, "we release binaries as a convenience" doesn't relax the
    > >> quality bar. The binaries are linked on our website and distributed
    > through
    > >> official Apache channels. They have to adhere to Apache release
    > >> requirements. And, most users consume our work via Maven dependencies,
    > >> which are binary artifacts.
    > >>
    > >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html goes into this in more
    > >> detail. A release must minimally include source packages, and can also
    > >> include binary artifacts.
    > >>
    > >> Best,
    > >> Andrew
    > >>
    > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko <
    > >> shv.hadoop@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >>> To avoid any confusion in this regard. I built RC0 manually in
    > compliance
    > >>> with Apache release policy
    > >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
    > >>> I edited the HowToReleasePreDSBCR page to make sure people don't use
    > >>> Jenkins option for building.
    > >>>
    > >>> A side note. This particular build is broken anyways, so no worries
    > there.
    > >>> I think though it would be useful to have it working for testing and
    > as a
    > >>> packaging standard.
    > >>>
    > >>> Thanks,
    > >>> --Konstantin
    > >>>
    > >>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Allen Wittenauer <
    > >>> aw@effectivemachines.com
    > >>> > wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>> >
    > >>> > > On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Konstantin Shvachko <
    > >>> shv.hadoop@gmail.com>
    > >>> > wrote:
    > >>> > >
    > >>> > > https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePreDSBCR
    > >>> >
    > >>> >         FYI:
    > >>> >
    > >>> >                 If you are using ASF Jenkins to create an ASF release
    > >>> > artifact, it's pretty much an automatic vote failure as any such
    > >>> release is
    > >>> > in violation of ASF policy.
    > >>> >
    > >>> >
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    

Mime
View raw message