hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vinayakumar B <vinayakumar...@huawei.com>
Subject [DISCUSS] Retire BKJM from trunk?
Date Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:14:44 GMT
Hi All,

   BKJM was Active and made much stable when the NameNode HA was implemented and there was
no QJM implemented.
   Now QJM is present and is much stable which is adopted by many production environment.
   I wonder whether it would be a good time to retire BKJM from trunk?

   Are there any users of BKJM exists?


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message