hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Erasure coding in branch-2 [Was Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-7285 (erasure coding) branch to trunk]
Date Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:06:11 GMT
Yes we can mostly likely help you. Please come over to dev@bigtop. 


> On Nov 4, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com> wrote:
> 
> We used to get help from Bigtop when it comes to integration testing. Do we
> think that's possible for 2.8?
> 
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Steve Loughran <stevel@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 23:11, Vinod Vavilapalli <vinodkv@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, I’ve already started looking at 2.8.0, that is exactly how I ended
>> up with this discussion on the state of EC.
>>> 
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 2, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Haohui Mai <ricetons@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> ricetons@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is it a good time to start the discussion on the issues of releasing 2.8?
>> 
>> Before rushing to release 2.8, people should be trying in downstream apps
>> today,. As well as identifying hdfs-client related issues, I've just
>> discovered that the MiniYARNCluster has added lots of stack traces
>> (YARN-4330), and I'm sure there are other regressions.
>> 
>> It's generally not that hard to take a downstream project and try to build
>> with a hadoop version of 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT; compilation and classpath problems
>> will show up immediately; unit test regressions can be at least identified
>> by switching between 2.7.1 and 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT.

Mime
View raw message