Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95B771811C for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50254 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2015 02:14:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49432 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2015 02:14:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49309 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2015 02:14:49 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:14:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4EFE81AA0F5; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:14:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.995 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.995 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYCv6Lz6XiEL; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oss.nttdata.co.jp (oss.nttdata.co.jp [49.212.34.109]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTP id 210B7428DF; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from macaa.local (p3b939381.tokynt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [59.147.147.129]) by oss.nttdata.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8120F17EE2C; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:14:33 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <55CD4EBF.1090901@oss.nttdata.co.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:13:19 +0900 From: Akira AJISAKA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Chris Trezzo , Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread References: <3B9443FB-DB04-4CCD-85E5-D7A2F762B06D@hortonworks.com> <1A12F0E4-4805-4C1F-9F4E-95860BDA45BF@hortonworks.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at oss.nttdata.co.jp X-Virus-Status: Clean +1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki. Thanks, Akira On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote: > I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this > is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email > too. > > This bug was originally reported with JDK 8. A code change in JDK 8 broke > our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change > UserGroupInformation to fix it. Just today I discovered that the JDK code > change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too. Specifically, I can > repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85. Since many users wouldn't expect > a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think > HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release. > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" wrote: > >> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it. >> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out, >> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies. >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> >>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in >>> 2.7.0. >>> >>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists. >>> >>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If >>> you >>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure >>> out >>> the why and the dependent tickets. >>> >>> Thanks >>> +Vinod >>> >>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee >> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704 >>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for >>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport >>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>> Put the list here: >>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started >>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks. >>> >>> Thanks >>> +Vinod >>> >>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >> > wrote: >>> >>> (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of >>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do >>> some ground work today. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >