hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vinayakumar B <vinayakum...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread
Date Fri, 14 Aug 2015 07:41:53 GMT
   1. HDFS-7446 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7446> : HDFS
   inotify should have the ability to determine what txid it has read up to


This is also marked for 2.6.1, but this changes the client protocol and
protobuf messages.

Please confirm whether this is Compatible change with 2.6?

Regards,
Vinay

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
wrote:

> +1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
>
>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
>> too.
>>
>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sjlee0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>
>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>>> you
>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>>> out
>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<mailto:vinodkv@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> Put the list here:
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@apache.org
>>>> <mailto:vinodkv@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message