Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C27210B53 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52399 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2015 21:49:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52290 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2015 21:49:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52198 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2015 21:49:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:49:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of busbey@cloudera.com designates 209.85.192.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.41] (HELO mail-qg0-f41.google.com) (209.85.192.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:49:34 +0000 Received: by qgdz60 with SMTP id z60so2140240qgd.1 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:47:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TnFKCndPzoRrhLYgMVK5CJll40v7igeve4A/IYnfqbw=; b=VRRLDJgQLMrfM9lcuk13WV5eb3UKMvBK5PpvSAAiuy3zT4+vWVJcclBoWFo3niLVXQ h443PH3LMphv2JyEP9wuygqKGX/h+CaawSOIal0M4pT2ldKyhKuyZhBQCebKAepR/Min DIlLEayp3NyoffOCcQy3xlzRDpQ57uiBeDAIzDDySnfuzyqQHiCZoUECvwZDfxN1gmj9 Rf3xhYHLDuzFdCwcYVMSER/QRaQmtYwq3dJFWUvP5mbz/ciSgEWcA0wX8L6pwDarcczY qDo4OYmKnZ8b9geU6a6/JNC4WKRwtS1Whr+Y9J0f6LFCZJOdVGAwTyk7Lk8OQTlMqC/u oO7w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkKpXcOIMSqTG69sBPcVaSZ2kXEXT+v0UdhEBidRGGmLJFSmIVB8/Xz+l0SMTNGktdOf1Ag X-Received: by 10.140.147.147 with SMTP id 141mr8783628qht.57.1425505663867; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:47:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.252.73 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:47:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sean Busbey Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:47:23 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reviving HADOOP-7435: Making Jenkins pre-commit build work with branches To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , Hadoop Common , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11376f48b877ec05107d6601 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11376f48b877ec05107d6601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 If we can make things look like HBase support for precommit testing on branches (HBASE-12944), that would make it easier for new and occasional contributors who might end up working in other ecosystem projects. AFAICT, Jonathan's proposal for branch names in patch names does this. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > Thanks for reviving this on email, Vinod. Newer folks like me might not be > aware of this JIRA/effort. > > This would be wonderful to have so (1) we know the status of release > branches (branch-2, etc.) and also (2) feature branches (YARN-2928). > Jonathan's or Matt's proposal for including branch name looks reasonable to > me. > > If none has any objections, I think we can continue on JIRA and get this > in. > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like us to revive the effort at > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7435 to make precommit > > builds being able to work with branches. Having the Jenkins verify > patches > > on branches is very useful even if there may be relaxed review oversight > on > > the said-branch. > > > > Unless there are objections, I'd request help from Giri who already has a > > patch sitting there for more than a year before. This may need us to > > collectively agree on some convention - the last comment says that the > > branch patch name should be in some format for this to work. > > > > Thanks, > > +Vinod > > > > > > -- > Karthik Kambatla > Software Engineer, Cloudera Inc. > -------------------------------------------- > http://five.sentenc.es > -- Sean --001a11376f48b877ec05107d6601--