hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Milind Bhandarkar <mbhandar...@gopivotal.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Pluggable Namespace
Date Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:49:35 GMT
Folks,

If you check the thread, I did respond to Vinod and others on technical
aspect of the proposal.

My later email was not intended for the hdfs-dev list, but was a personal
note to Vinod. Unfortunately, the reply-to meant it went to hdfs-dev, and
not to Vinod personally (although my To field had Vinod's name in it, I
checked again to see that in my address book, Vinod's email is entered as
hdfs-dev automatically), and I realized that today after I checked hdfs-dev
list. I apologize for the mishap.

Let's keep the discussions technical here.

- milind


---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
+1-650-523-3858 (W)
+1-408-666-8483 (C)


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

>
> Milind/Andrew and everyone else,
>
> Didn't know an innocuous question regarding a technical issue can blow up
> so much.
>
> I asked a technical question. If you have an answer and you want to
> respond, please do so. If you don't have an answer, you can reply so.
> Otherwise please keep this thread for the technical discussions of the
> proposal.
>
> If you have other non-technical concerns, fork this thread and participate
> in that. Even then, I think the dev lists are for discussing technical
> matters, we can all try to keep it that way.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > I recognize some of what we recently experienced on a HDFS matter in what
> > Milind wrote even if this was not the appropriate forum for it. Odd
> mention
> > of "conspiracy theories" aside, for people who may come to this thread
> > later, perhaps you can recommend an appropriate public Apache community
> > forum for discussing such concerns?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Milind Bhandarkar
> >> <mbhandarkar@gopivotal.com> wrote:
> >>> Is Hortonworks concerned that this proposal conflicts with their
> >>> development on federated namenode ?
> >>
> >> This question might better be asked directly of folks at Hortonworks
> >> rather than here.
> >>
> >> Let's please not dwell on such aspects here, keeping this discussion
> >> technical.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Doug
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >   - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message