Mailing-List: contact hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 13:49:35 -0700
From: Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org,
        "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
        "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha
Message-ID: <20130601204935.GC3227@tpx>
Mail-Followup-To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org,
	"mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
	"common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
References: <20130525034836.GB3423@tpx>
 <03EE2601-2DF2-409F-A171-A307DF86D750@hortonworks.com>
 <CACO5Y4z1mKM-mHDcmv=kQ72462yinpYTncU8ZLPJZms3=bVExA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130530213904.GN27292@linspire.com>
 <CACO5Y4wmqF+-RJUp1sjEdfhtE+L8Q0jEmPYeZ1XrzJg8krnjCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130530222505.GP27292@linspire.com>
 <CACO5Y4wexNSXX_88j96itcKKcNhaG0z5_1NBxth6NL2R36zn4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130531005102.GU27292@linspire.com>
 <CACO5Y4xpg4tYQBgKVX6k=1EPMv9J4DimmJNB79yjZ4WkuWYA_A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACO5Y4xpg4tYQBgKVX6k=1EPMv9J4DimmJNB79yjZ4WkuWYA_A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Chris,

with 2.0.5-alpha (rc1) out, would you please take a look at the release bit=
s?
I assume the four-digit numbering scheme issue has been resolved now.

Regards,
  Cos

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:18PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrot=
e:
> > I have no issues of changing the version to 2.0.5-alpha and restarting =
to vote
> > for the release content, e.g. 2 bug fixes. Shall I call 3 days re-vote =
because
> > of the number change?
>=20
> +1 Sounds great.
>=20
> > Does the result of bylaw vote nullifies the unfinished vote started by =
Arun?
> > Sorry, I am dense, apparently.
>=20
> Yes, nobody should feel bound by either vote. The bylaw change
> clarifies that release plans are for RMs to solicit feedback and gauge
> PMC support for an artifact, not pre-approvals for doing work.
>=20
> > Can we limit the vote thread to the merits of the release then?
>=20
> Happily.
>=20
> > That sound like adding an insult to injury, if my forth-language skills=
 do not
> > mislead me.
>=20
> They do mislead you, or I've expressed the point imprecisely. We can
> take this offline. -C
>=20
> >> >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:48PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks=
=2Ecom> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Why not include MAPREDUCE-4211 as well rather than create one =
release per patch?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> From Cos's description, it sounded like these were backports of =
fixes
> >> >> >> to help Sqoop2 and fix some build issues. If it's not just to fi=
xup
> >> >> >> leftover bugs in 2.0.4 *once* so downstream projects can integra=
te
> >> >> >> against 2.0.4.1, and this a release series, then I've completely
> >> >> >> misunderstood the purpose.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cos, are you planning 2.0.4.2?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Also, this is the first time we are seeing a four-numbered sch=
eme in Hadoop. Why not call this 2.0.5-alpha?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Good point. Since it contains only backports from branch-2, it w=
ould
> >> >> >> make sense for it to be an intermediate release.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I shouldn't have to say this, but I'm changing my vote to -1 whi=
le we
> >> >> >> work this out. -C
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > On May 24, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> All,
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.4.1-a=
lpha that I would
> >> >> >> >> like to release.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a cou=
ple a of issues
> >> >> >> >> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-=
2.0.4.1-alpha-rc0/
> >> >> >> >> The RC tag in svn is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ha=
doop/common/tags/release-2.0.4.1-alpha-rc0
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for t=
he usual 7 days.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thanks for your voting
> >> >> >> >>  Cos
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >

--WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlGqXl8ACgkQenyFlstYjhIMmQD+O7VJ9RpTyNrWisXvo/9Yk5/C
fgcKOfrMNricf5LQ+tYA/ivzxHQryBHKT52a5qnMH/DfqUeG9jug/rwXq9sxQkhn
=M68E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh--