hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arun C Murthy <...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha
Date Mon, 03 Jun 2013 04:17:19 GMT
I do it in the release branch, so the release source tarball has the date.

Arun

On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is created. Not
>> sure what Matt actually does on branch-1. Matt?
> 
> Arun, but you do this not in the release source tarball, right? Just in the
> rest of integration branches, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
> 
> Thanks,
>  Cos
> 
>> hth,
>> Arun
>> 
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>> 
>>> This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun was
>>> cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed the example. 
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your input and help Alejandro!
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Cos
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 09:01AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>> I know we had this issue before. But and easy way to solve it it would be
>>>> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
>>>> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>>>> 
>>>> +1 on rc1
>>>> 
>>>> Thx
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I believe this is chicken and egg problem: I can't put release date into
>>>>> unreleased tarball. Looking into 2.0.4-alpha source tarball I see the
same
>>>>> situation:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED
>>>>> 
>>>>> But in the trunk and branch-2 the release data is in place. I don't think
this
>>>>> is an issue. But I would be happy to fix it if this seems to be a problem.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Cos
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:04PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>> On RC1, verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo cluster,
run a
>>>>>> couple of sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> CHANGES.txt files contents are correct now. Still, a minor NIT, they
have
>>>>>> 2.0.5 as UNRELEASED, shouldn't they have a date (I would assume the
date
>>>>>> the vote ends).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, J. Rottinghuis <jrottinghuis@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for fixing Cos.
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
>>>>>>> looks good to me.
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Joep
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> later. It has been committed as
>>>>>>>> r1465124
>>>>>>>> The reason it isn't normally visible because of the weird
commit message:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      svn merge -c1465121 from trunk
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So, we good. I am done with the CHANGES.txt fixed that you
guys have
>>>>>>> noted
>>>>>>>> earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alejandro,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha
section
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: apparently
I didn't get
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> to branch-2.0.4-alpha back then, although I distinctively
remember
>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>> Let me pull it into 2.0.5-alpha and update CHANGES.txt
to reflect it.
>>>>>>>> Also, I
>>>>>>>>> will do JIRA in a moment.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Joep, appreciate the thorough examination. I have fixed
the dates for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> releases 2.0.4-alpha. As for the top-level readme file
- sorry I wasn't
>>>>>>>> aware
>>>>>>>>> about them. As for the binary: I am pretty sure we are
only releasing
>>>>>>>> source
>>>>>>>>> code, but I will put binaries into the rc1 respin.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I will respin rc1 shortly. Appreciate the feedback!
>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:27PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Verified MD5 & signature, built, configured pseudo
cluster, run a
>>>>>>>> couple of
>>>>>>>>>> sample jobs, tested HTTPFS.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Still, something seems odd.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The HDFS CHANGES.txt has the following entry under
2.0.5-alpha:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> HDFS-4646. createNNProxyWithClientProtocol ignores
configured
>>>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>>>> value  (Jagane Sundar via cos)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> but I don't see that in the branch.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> And, the YARN CHANGES.txt does not have the 2.0.5-alpha
section (it
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> be there empty).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
<cos@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for
hadoop-2.0.5-alpha
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> like to release.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a stabilization release that includes
fixed for a couple a
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release
candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC is available at:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc0/
>>>>>>>>>>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.5-alpha-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The maven artifacts will be available via repository.apache.org
on
>>>>>>>> Sat,
>>>>>>>>>>> June
>>>>>>>>>>> 1st, 2013 at 2 pm PDT as outlined here
>>>>>>>>>>>  http://s.apache.org/WKD
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote
will run for the 3
>>>>>>>> days,
>>>>>>>>>>> because this is just a version name change. The
bits are identical
>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>>>> voted on before in
>>>>>>>>>>>  http://s.apache.org/2041move
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your voting
>>>>>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Alejandro
>> 
>> --
>> Arun C. Murthy
>> Hortonworks Inc.
>> http://hortonworks.com/
>> 
>> 

--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/



Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message