hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantin Boudnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha
Date Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:49:35 GMT
Chris,

with 2.0.5-alpha (rc1) out, would you please take a look at the release bits?
I assume the four-digit numbering scheme issue has been resolved now.

Regards,
  Cos

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:18PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> > I have no issues of changing the version to 2.0.5-alpha and restarting to vote
> > for the release content, e.g. 2 bug fixes. Shall I call 3 days re-vote because
> > of the number change?
> 
> +1 Sounds great.
> 
> > Does the result of bylaw vote nullifies the unfinished vote started by Arun?
> > Sorry, I am dense, apparently.
> 
> Yes, nobody should feel bound by either vote. The bylaw change
> clarifies that release plans are for RMs to solicit feedback and gauge
> PMC support for an artifact, not pre-approvals for doing work.
> 
> > Can we limit the vote thread to the merits of the release then?
> 
> Happily.
> 
> > That sound like adding an insult to injury, if my forth-language skills do not
> > mislead me.
> 
> They do mislead you, or I've expressed the point imprecisely. We can
> take this offline. -C
> 
> >> >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:48PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >> > Why not include MAPREDUCE-4211 as well rather than create
one release per patch?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> From Cos's description, it sounded like these were backports
of fixes
> >> >> >> to help Sqoop2 and fix some build issues. If it's not just
to fixup
> >> >> >> leftover bugs in 2.0.4 *once* so downstream projects can integrate
> >> >> >> against 2.0.4.1, and this a release series, then I've completely
> >> >> >> misunderstood the purpose.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cos, are you planning 2.0.4.2?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Also, this is the first time we are seeing a four-numbered
scheme in Hadoop. Why not call this 2.0.5-alpha?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Good point. Since it contains only backports from branch-2,
it would
> >> >> >> make sense for it to be an intermediate release.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I shouldn't have to say this, but I'm changing my vote to
-1 while we
> >> >> >> work this out. -C
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > On May 24, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> All,
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.4.1-alpha
that I would
> >> >> >> >> like to release.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> This is a stabilization release that includes fixed
for a couple a of issues
> >> >> >> >> discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release
candidate.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.4.1-alpha-rc0/
> >> >> >> >> The RC tag in svn is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.4.1-alpha-rc0
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will
run for the usual 7 days.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thanks for your voting
> >> >> >> >>  Cos
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >

Mime
View raw message