hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:35:58 GMT
+1 (non binding)

If this gets in, a backport to branch-2 would be most appreciated.


On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Colin McCabe <cmccabe@alumni.cmu.edu>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to merge the HDFS-347 branch back to trunk.  It's been
> under intensive review and testing for several months.  The branch
> adds a lot of new unit tests, and passes Jenkins as of 2/15 [1]
>
> We have tested HDFS-347 with both random and sequential workloads. The
> short-circuit case is substantially faster [2], and overall
> performance looks very good.  This is especially encouraging given
> that the initial goal of this work was to make security compatible
> with short-circuit local reads, rather than to optimize the
> short-circuit code path.  We've also stress-tested HDFS-347 on a
> number of clusters.
>
> This iniial VOTE is to merge only into trunk.  Just as we have done
> with our other recent merges, we will consider merging into branch-2
> after the code has been in trunk for few weeks.
>
> Please cast your vote by EOD Sunday 2/24.
>
> best,
> Colin McCabe
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347?focusedCommentId=13579704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13579704
>
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347?focusedCommentId=13551755&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13551755
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message