hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tsz Wo Sze <szets...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:03:45 GMT
Hi Colin,

The latest HDFS-347 patch was posted on Feb 16.  Because of the long weekends, I still do
not have a chance to check it.  Will do it in this week.

Nicholas




________________________________
 From: Colin McCabe <cmccabe@alumni.cmu.edu>
To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org 
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 1:48 PM
Subject: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
 
Hi all,

I would like to merge the HDFS-347 branch back to trunk.  It's been
under intensive review and testing for several months.  The branch
adds a lot of new unit tests, and passes Jenkins as of 2/15 [1]

We have tested HDFS-347 with both random and sequential workloads. The
short-circuit case is substantially faster [2], and overall
performance looks very good.  This is especially encouraging given
that the initial goal of this work was to make security compatible
with short-circuit local reads, rather than to optimize the
short-circuit code path.  We've also stress-tested HDFS-347 on a
number of clusters.

This iniial VOTE is to merge only into trunk.  Just as we have done
with our other recent merges, we will consider merging into branch-2
after the code has been in trunk for few weeks.

Please cast your vote by EOD Sunday 2/24.

best,
Colin McCabe

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347?focusedCommentId=13579704&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13579704

[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347?focusedCommentId=13551755&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13551755
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message