hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dhruba Borthakur <dhr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Remove append?
Date Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:18:49 GMT
I think "append" would be useful. But not precisely sure which applications
would use it. I would vote to keep the code though and not remove it.


On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <szetszwo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > @Eli, Removing a feature would simplify the design and code.  I think
> this is a generally true statement but not specific to Append.  The
> question is whether Append is useless and it should be removed?  I think it
> is clear from this email thread that the answer is no.
> @Nicholas, no one is saying append is "useless and should be removed."
>  The discussion is perhaps a little more subtle than you've understood
> it to be.
> If there are a lot of good use cases I'm all for it, I just don't see
> downstream projects using it any time soon (which is not to say they
> don't want it, just that they can't depend on something not in 1.x),
> and I haven't seen much demand.  I wanted to hear from others if they
> had.  When I brought it up with a room of hdfs developers from 3
> different companies no one felt strongly. And so far only a handful of
> people have chimed in, I actually thought more would.
> Thanks,
> Eli

Subscribe to my posts at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message