hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Todd Lipcon (Resolved) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-3074) HDFS ignores group of a user when creating a file or a directory, and instead inherits
Date Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:10:41 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Todd Lipcon resolved HDFS-3074.

    Resolution: Won't Fix

For whatever strange historic reason, Hadoop uses BSD semantics instead of Linux semantics
for group ownership at creation. I filed this "bug" once, too :)
> HDFS ignores group of a user when creating a file or a directory, and instead inherits
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HDFS-3074
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3074
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: name-node
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.1
>            Reporter: Harsh J
>            Priority: Minor
> When creating a file or making a directory on HDFS, the namesystem calls pass {{null}}
for the group name, thereby having the parent directory permissions inherited onto the file.
> This is not how the Linux FS works at least.
> For instance, if I have today a user 'foo' with default group 'foo', and I have my HDFS
home dir created as "foo:foo" by the HDFS admin, all files I create under my directory too
will have "foo" as group unless I chgrp them myself. This makes sense.
> Now, if my admin were to change my local accounts' default/primary group to 'bar' (but
did not change so on my homedir on HDFS, and I were to continue writing files to my home directory
or any subdirectory that has 'foo' as group, all files still get created with group 'foo'
- as if the NN has not realized the primary group of the mapped shell account has already
> On linux this is the opposite. My login session's current primary group is what determines
the default group on my created files and directories, not the parent dir owner.
> If the create and mkdirs call passed UGI's group info (UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getGroupNames()[0]
should give primary group?) along into their calls instead of a null in the PermissionsStatus
object, perhaps this can be avoided.
> Or should we leave this as-is, and instead state that if admins wish their default groups
of users to change, they'd have to chgrp all the directories themselves?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message