Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A42A97ED for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 06:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53762 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2012 06:52:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53201 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2012 06:52:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53192 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2012 06:52:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:52:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of htims.rm.p@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:52:32 +0000 Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so2245249wib.35 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:52:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=re7CoP5m42POW6oGLB2pxjA9BMOYsTjG3gAW5IOyqho=; b=ip1+VvrQc+l6sj1GJkIUvr5LAD1Vc0O8TVzZSqCK657nHY6yr0FGdMQY52UKzuFGBD OC0o11LG+fo0IEvodLYgbydJxRmCu+HjWfO0j6yd+bwV+wWfytYN/vx0PoCQ7/O2Dwl7 Svy0rG1w03SxR1h+mc4z0rY87Cxl1JXq4RW1I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr12890703wiw.18.1328165532683; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.79.70 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:52:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:52:12 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: a newbie question From: Peter S To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04388ee9c74cf804b7f5a215 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04388ee9c74cf804b7f5a215 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Clear enough for me to understand. Thanks a lot, Harsh! Peter On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Peter S wrote: > > Hi Harsh, > > > > Thanks a lot for the reply. Some questions are inline. > > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Harsh J wrote: > > > >> Peter, > >> > >> (Inline) > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Peter S wrote: > >> > I realize the version numbers are actually different branches, e.g. > >> > branch-0.21, branch-0.22, branch-0.23, and trunk. I am wondering which > >> > branch should I use and develop on? Which one is most stable? > >> > >> All new work is to go to trunk (presently numbered as 0.24). > > > > Then how about 1.0.*? It seems in the beta version. But why trunk number > > is still 0.24? > > 1.0 is a rename of the 0.20 line, its not > 0.21+. Other branches will > be renamed eventually, but the rename has not happened yet. Agree its > confusing, but perhaps the illustrations on > http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2012/01/an-update-on-apache-hadoop-1-0/ > and https://blogs.apache.org/bigtop/entry/all_you_wanted_to_know will > help you understand completely. > > >> The page at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute goes over > >> setting up the trunk development workspace and should help you get > >> started. > >> > >> What do you mean by "most stable"? Do you ask in terms of build > stability? > >> > > I mean in production. From the release page: > > " > > 0.20.X - legacy stable version > > 0.20.203.X - current stable version > > 1.0.X - current beta version, 1.0 release > > 0.22.X - does not include security > > 0.23.X - current alpha version > > " > > I don't quite get this. Why 0.23.X is in alpha version, but 1.0.X is in > > beta version? And the 0.22.X doesn't include security. How does this > > release number work? > > > > For Cloudera version, will all the patches in CDH also in 1.0.X? > > I think my previous comment should cover these questions. Its a > chaotic series of numbers after the rename happened partially, but the > numbering will stabilize soon. > > Also, best to ask CDH specific questions over its active user forums > at https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/cdh-user/topics > > >> > For hadoop common repo, which version should I use for a particular > hdfs > >> > version? > >> > >> Don't quite get this question. > >> > > Because common repo and hdfs repo is separate, is it possible to have > some > > incompatibility between the two. > > The project was all merged back recently, you only need to use the > hadoop-common repository: > > i.e. Use http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ (or) > https://github.com/apache/hadoop-common / > http://git.apache.org/hadoop-common.git > > -- > Harsh J > Customer Ops. Engineer > Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about > --f46d04388ee9c74cf804b7f5a215--