hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Loughran (Resolved) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-326) Add a lifecycle interface for Hadoop components: namenodes, job clients, etc.
Date Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:21:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Steve Loughran resolved HDFS-326.
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

Superceded by YARN, though a lot of the work here needs to be pulled in there, which can be
done on a case by case basis
                
> Add a lifecycle interface for Hadoop components: namenodes, job clients, etc.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-326
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-326
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>         Attachments: AbstractHadoopComponent.java, HADOOP-3628-18.patch, HADOOP-3628-19.patch,
HDFS-326.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch,
hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch,
hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch,
hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-3628.patch, hadoop-lifecycle-tomw.sxw, hadoop-lifecycle.pdf,
hadoop-lifecycle.pdf, hadoop-lifecycle.sxw
>
>
> I'd like to propose we have a standard interface for hadoop components, the things that
get started or stopped when you bring up a namenode. currently, some of these classes have
a stop() or shutdown() method, with no standard name/interface, but no way of seeing if they
are live, checking their health of shutting them down reliably. Indeed, there is a tendency
for the spawned threads to not want to die; to require the entire process to be killed to
stop the workers. 
> Having a standard interface would make it easier for 
>  * management tools to manage the different things
>  * monitoring the state of things
>  * subclassing
> The latter is interesting as right now TaskTracker and JobTracker start up threads in
their constructor; that's very dangerous as subclasses may have their methods called before
they are full initialised. Adding this interface would be the right time to clean up the startup
process so that subclassing is less risky.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message