Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DC0B3BE4 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70676 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 20:34:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70633 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 20:34:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70625 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2011 20:34:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:34:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:33:57 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.123.81]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p3SKXJXg011938 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:33:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--701914586 Subject: Re: [Discuss] Merge federation branch HDFS-1052 into trunk Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:33:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org References: <4DB5E962.2000206@apache.org> <4DB79ED9.9020205@apache.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-1--701914586 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:12 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > The question is whether this is a > * Code Change, > which requires Lazy consensus of active committers or a > * Adoption of New Codebase, > which needs Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members This is a code change, just like all of our jiras. The standard rules of = at least one +1 on the jira and no -1's apply. Adoption of new codebase is adopting a new subproject or completely = replacing trunk. > Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes. This was clarified in the bylaws back in November. = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201011.mbox/%3C159= E99C4-B71C-437E-9640-AA24C50D636E@apache.org%3E Where it was modified to: Lazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of one +1. The code can be committed after the first +1. -- Owen= --Apple-Mail-1--701914586--