hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Commit HDFS-927 to both 0.20 and 0.21 branch?
Date Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:15:49 GMT
+1

(btw is there anything we can do about the maniacal spam classifier on
this list? it marked my first three attempts to +1 this patch as
spam...)

-Todd

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > I'd like to open a vote on committing HDFS-927 to both hadoop branch
> > 0.20 and to 0.21.
> >
> > HDFS-927 "DFSInputStream retries too many times for new block
> > location" has an odd summary but in short, its a better HDFS-127
> > "DFSClient block read failures cause open DFSInputStream to become
> > unusable".  HDFS-127 is an old, popular issue that refuses to die.  We
> > voted on having it committed to the 0.20 branch not too long ago, see
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg00401.html,
> > only it broke TestFsck (See http://su.pr/1nylUn) so it was reverted.
> >
> > High-level, HDFS-127/HDFS-927 is about fixing DFSClient so it a good
> > read cleans out the failures count (Previous failures 'stuck' though
> > there may have been hours of successful reads in betwixt).  When
> > rolling hadoop 0.20.2 was proposed, a few fellas including myself
> > raised a lack of HDFS-127 as an obstacle.
> >
> > HDFS-927 has been committed to TRUNK.
> >
> > I'm +1 on committing to 0.20 and to 0.21 branches.
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time to take a look into this issue.
> > St.Ack
> >

Mime
View raw message