hadoop-hdfs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2
Date Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:13:13 GMT
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Cosmin Lehene <clehene@adobe.com> wrote:

> HDFS-909 left us with a corrupted HDFS
>
>
Given there isn't yet a patch against branch-20 for HDFS-909, I don't think
we should block a release for it. There's nothing preventing us from
releasing 0.20.3 later.

-Todd

>
>
> On 1/28/10 4:14 AM, "Andrew Purtell" <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > So the list of HDFS issues for next 0.20.x or 0.21 most relevant to HBase
> > stability I have is:
> >
> >    127
> >    200 (well, hflush)
> >    630
> >    793
> >
> >
> > Sound about right? Anything important I'm missing?
> >
> >   -  Andy
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
> >> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> >> Sent: Thu, January 28, 2010 9:14:01 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2
> >>
> >> I don't think 101 is a real blocker - I haven't been able to reliably
> >> produce it. HDFS-793 fixes most of the issues I've seen in practice, and
> we
> >> now have a new patch in branch-20 which should fix that.
> >>
> >> 127 would be nice - there's a patch on that JIRA waiting for review as
> >> below.
> >>
> >> -Todd
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stack wrote:
> >>
> >>> If the new release included (fixedup) hdfs-127 and hdfs-101, the hbase
> >>> crew would be big fans of an hadoop 0.20.2.
> >>> St.Ack
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> >>>> HDFS-127 was originally committed, then rolled back from 0.20 as it
> >>> caused
> >>>> test timeouts due to infinite loop. I put a new patch up there but it
> has
> >>>> not been reviewed, and thus not committed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.20.2 or can we hold out for
> these
> >>>> patches?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Todd
> >>>>
> >>>> 2010/1/26 Kay Kay
> >>>>
> >>>>> Is HDFS-127 going to be  part of it ? (seems to have been committed
> as
> >>> per
> >>>>> the jira).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there
any
> blockers
> >>>>>>> that can't wait?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -- Owen
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message