Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2A6711F00 for ; Thu, 9 May 2013 21:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69885 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2013 21:42:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69793 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2013 21:42:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69785 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2013 21:42:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 May 2013 21:42:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.49] (HELO mail-la0-f49.google.com) (209.85.215.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 May 2013 21:41:58 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ee20so105926lab.22 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 14:41:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=B6xNt4lMSmcdQT4m0RydPwTJ51K+xyYugPRZo90lBkM=; b=S3C9Io1+iUmIIwOUa+TT+7leaIKIxS0AyHtTiKcvaQMlCesEPkDckSXE1lUhDCl2yR 9Ko/YBEiLh/RYKggSb5eKhqgmR3sXm1gFNLPaJWrIoB3LjBcCo2yqvxjSCcu3AeSFbdZ H+Y4gyCLtgOJ0WBXtg4IkGkNlAAtkXsdAPt39wWJrZsx0Ri2TTvSZQkiKqSg9B9h+Bnj 1BUsfAMoA1a522vwbWEXFmO0OsqIAe4eVJRgXHCrfUrmhB4rvDuDHl3jmzQItDQXZ9od +c1qwv8WoYEX8vq/83XA7fJ9lp2mL7Q5DBVW2wdTBM0CPHE2wupX/ffBbiBu5+Yz2yLB k8Qg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.161.38 with SMTP id xp6mr6276386lbb.32.1368135696883; Thu, 09 May 2013 14:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.5.193 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:41:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <571F509B-BA35-4024-93EF-72F50B5530CC@hortonworks.com> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:41:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c264fe37aa7904dc4fea6a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c264fe37aa7904dc4fea6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh. And it would be good to have an explanation for -1 votes. Only one negative vote came with a reason so far. Thanks, --Konstantin On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > I agree it was premature to start this vote and I also thought it was going > to be restarted given > the discussions Nicholas, Roman and Steve had started on this thread. > > I am -1 (binding) on this. > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > Konstantin, > > > > You know I've been strongly opposed to this due to the bad precedents it > > sets; as I've made clear publicly in the *-dev lists. > > > > I was under impression you would restart this vote, but my bad. > > > > I am going to -1 this (binding). > > > > Could you please consider my vote or should I start a new one to unroll > > this? > > > > thanks, > > Arun > > > > On May 8, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > > > > My formal +1. > > > > > > Vote passes with > > > 3 binding +1s > > > 1 non-binding +1 > > > 1 binding -1 > > > 1 non-binding -1 > > > and one (Steve's) vote which I couldn't categorize: 1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Please vote on the following plan for Hadoop release 2.0.5 > > >> - bug fixes encountered in current release 2.0.4-alpha > > >> - make all API changes to allow freezing them post 2.0.5 > > >> - no new features > > >> > > >> As discussed on @dev thread > > >> http://s.apache.org/fs > > >> this will allow to stabilize 2.0 branch in a short and predictable > > period > > >> of time. > > >> This enables a powerful option to have the release tested at Yahoo > > scale. > > >> The plan is to follow up with 2.1.0 - the stable release. > > >> New features can and should be added on top of the stable release once > > it > > >> is out. > > >> > > >> Hadoop by-laws: > > >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html > > >> > > >> "Release Plan > > >> Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also > > nominates a > > >> Release Manager. > > >> Lazy majority of active committers" > > >> > > >> assume nomination of a Release Manager with the plan. > > >> It would be really good if Arun continues if this plan is adopted. > > >> We can return to the RM topic if not. > > >> > > >> The vote will run for 7 days until next Wed, May 8th. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> --Konstantin > > >> > > > > -- > > Arun C. Murthy > > Hortonworks Inc. > > http://hortonworks.com/ > > > > > > > > > -- > http://hortonworks.com/download/ > --001a11c264fe37aa7904dc4fea6a--