Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sanjay@hortonworks.com
 designates 209.85.210.53 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Subject: Re: [RESULT] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5
From: sanjay Radia <sanjay@hortonworks.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKtuutHk8_cUUj37LBHiHdGx3-6usf7PdD-nf8TL48G=XFtRCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 21:16:15 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <214E5E69-B834-4238-91B1-EAE00CA5D233@hortonworks.com>
References: 
 <CAKtuutEnhyro1XemMLxCHyBFX5pJuiJYDxwJ5bQFew5_R7HY1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <8BD71C17-70EC-4871-AA8E-D76145CE9D3E@hortonworks.com>
 <CAKtuutGqbn8uYnOBMa3DjtWFBmSiJaJBZktvkHtK=tCGj2VHZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <334C393B-E9FE-4C04-A84A-AFB0F8D4D969@hortonworks.com>
 <CAKtuutHk8_cUUj37LBHiHdGx3-6usf7PdD-nf8TL48G=XFtRCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org


Konstantine
  I read the email from Arun that you quoted, three times; I can't see =
anything that Arun said that warrants your rude response.
You have made a couple of uncivil comments recently. Not sure what is =
bugging you, but regardless, this sort of behavior is unwarranted.
Further, such insulting comments  does not help the conversation in this =
thread which, as several have noted, is already confusing .

sanjay


On May 14, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:

> Sounds like you are having fun, Arun.
> 2.0.5 is explicitly in the subject line for this vote.
> No worries I'll fix that.
>=20
> You should stop assuming - it's in nobody interests - and start =
reading.
> --Konst
>=20
>=20
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On May 14, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>>=20
>>>> I can point you towards a set of fixes I think important for YARN
>>> (nodemanager, security etc.).
>>>=20
>>> That would be very much appreciated.
>>>=20
>>>> I'll do the 2.1 series by renaming the planned 2.0.5 to 2.1.
>>>=20
>>> Thanks.
>>>=20
>>=20
>> Thanks. I've copied branch-2.0.4-alpha as a new branch-2.0-alpha =
branch.
>>=20
>> This way you can start with a clean slate. Good luck.
>>=20
>> As I noted before in the thread, the APIs in branch-2.0-alpha will =
remain
>> incompatible with branch-2.
>>=20
>> thanks,
>> Arun