hadoop-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] sed bylaws.html -e 's/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi'
Date Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:08:24 GMT
Cool, thanks Bobby. Is someone going to do a separate vote for Doug's
suggestion?


On 2 April 2013 17:05, Robert Evans <evans@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> I don't think I messed this up but if I for the binding/non-binding count
> wrong then please forgive me.
> With 9-binding +1s 8-non-binding +1s and no vetoes the vote passes.
>
> I will update the bylaws accordingly.
>
> --Bobby
>
>
> On 3/28/13 11:07 AM, "Jason Lowe" <jlowe@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
> >+1 (binding)
> >
> >Jason
> >
> >On 03/25/2013 01:28 PM, Robert Evans wrote:
> >> As per Aaron's request I am starting a new voting thread to make it
> >>obvious that there is a vote happening.
> >>
> >> I propose that we change the term "lazy consensus" to "consensus
> >>approval" (aka s/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi) in the bylaws
> >>so that it matches the terms used in the apache foundation glossary.  No
> >>actual change to our voting would take place, just the term we use to
> >>describe that voting.
> >>
> >> As per the by-laws this would take a "lazy majority" of active PMC
> >>members (although others are encouraged to speak up).
> >>
> >> Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and
> >>more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
> >>
> >> Voting lasts 7 days, so it closes Monday April 1st (But this is not a
> >>joke).
> >>
> >> I am +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> --Bobby
> >
>
>


-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message