Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECD11D88D for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12331 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2012 23:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12234 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2012 23:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12225 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2012 23:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-la0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:53:31 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id o2so3644132lag.35 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:53:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Bx1A3ObvSShbPFfUbsqGUwwAYTnCbUoHyz5onTh7BGE=; b=UHh5Feg3df+MJevLJY7Zm2FSPx6kmnasSV5SAbArgKuVyRMiHeuVV/dIf0Ti7yhy1P PdPXskrxEVh+gUR61TTdQH36RiHLptcRtZG9C9l/oZ1NvL7pFzfjLmMNp7bTx8T2muum o61P8t67q5hTsFFr7qPHkb597cmm/wa8LbI7xQ9Y3r3kCInAHQytmlWy/8OSTx28srLA L5ncBhCC0zEoOToDzTj4Jhip2qeJuk2qI7qd0yPDXXYHInvnDu5dgtaUOSHbA/vofeJ4 1sYijrC/A6QMGDNREdAmGIKYptVqTAWtYLRdPVsR8OQXswG0CONTj80Y2MHh04x2wyWZ LJcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.17.169 with SMTP id p9mr8538767lbd.9.1352764390887; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:53:10 -0800 (PST) Sender: owen.omalley@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.112.97 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:53:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1352762627.36888.YahooMailNeo@web125702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <69136206-F6DD-4E2A-A915-7D02C0EBAC7A@hortonworks.com> <097FEDC9-5EAA-4BAB-95E0-D1B24222D616@hortonworks.com> <1352762627.36888.YahooMailNeo@web125702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:53:10 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iBYThW2jZ5_xLcJ4kwpZLM53WFc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Clarify bylaws on PMC chair voting From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general hadoop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554dab8fbd09b04ce55000a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec554dab8fbd09b04ce55000a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks, Nicholas. I think the vote for PMC chair should be a straight majority vote with STV used in the case of more than 2 choices. Using +1 and/or -1's when voting in a multiple choice seems confused and likely to cause more problems than it solves. -- Owen --bcaec554dab8fbd09b04ce55000a--