Return-Path: 
 <general-return-5349-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C13DBD5E9
	for <apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:54:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 46693 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2012 22:54:17 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46611 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2012 22:54:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.hadoop.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46603 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2012 22:54:17 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:54:17 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates
 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-ee0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:54:08 +0000
Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so986438eek.35
        for <general@hadoop.apache.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=BtKYE1uugtwaGW6S9hGl/Rs4rGd7IZJrYm0srX6qU5g=;
        b=Ng4rPmMSKEMPaNt5N2ckDwtNTO7fBtZAGIK0CcbTi8pZNYD+W+0YVnJ34ndZpfSaVI
         I0zya2Gdp+c42yydN0enTLwaUi8Mk+yD5K6W1z+vK02EGU+i89w7tzMMGqsZn4462e1y
         3nXFH5Es8o+V7kSjvrqBhoReZ3ZVbe+m9ZrpuhL3yj+4n+fDb4Ie79N5Qivy1pB8t01V
         ReRVOXfpzJL6TO77dg+aKZsWC0gHP1qg5fwxQDJWGF0xr411qizTLI9PS1pp1fDktl/6
         5DXcRlAP2yqvF1pNSj2q4hWmHdhEAi4kHjWn6CcP0ywFQpYJsmhxEj5W8U35FHfNZ0G9
         ex3A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.221.197 with SMTP id r45mr7117442eep.41.1345848827038; Fri,
 24 Aug 2012 15:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.48.7 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPn_vTszZHU9-nUoRU=aW-AvWQZpDOkPem56LgkYGOHk8VVd3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPn_vTszZHU9-nUoRU=aW-AvWQZpDOkPem56LgkYGOHk8VVd3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:53:46 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAPn_vTvctLh-5+kMP5jnWrrZq_F0nWLg4D9s2BGPMKUdWULi9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maintain a single committer list for the Hadoop project
From: Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQnWpXnPdZo2xf6uzG0Ovn7wN9vk2ikvrCVFJgh3Say486ymrHvike5PzbG8p/fpdYB+te+e
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Per this thread [1] should we have a single set of committers for the
> entire Hadoop project, ie all subprojects?
>
> If the vote passes, current and future committers will gain commit
> rights in all current (Common, HDFS, MapReduce, YARN) and future
> Hadoop subprojects. The specific change to the bylaws follows:
>
> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml      (revision 1376823)
> +++ main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml      (working copy)
> @@ -64,10 +64,9 @@
>     <li> <strong>Committers</strong>
>
>          <p>The project's Committers are responsible for the project's
> -        technical management. Committers have access to a specified
> -        set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on
> -        subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion
> -        regarding that subproject.</p>
> +        technical management. Committers have access to all subproject
> +        subversion repositories. Committers may cast binding votes on
> +        any technical discussion regarding that subproject.</p>
>

Andy Isaacson pointed out that I should replace "that" with "any"
above in "regarding that subproject" to make this more clear.  Here's
the updated diff, same intent.

site $ svn diff
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
===================================================================
--- main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml	(revision 1376823)
+++ main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml	(working copy)
@@ -64,10 +64,9 @@
    <li> <strong>Committers</strong>

         <p>The project's Committers are responsible for the project's
-        technical management. Committers have access to a specified
-        set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on
-        subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion
-        regarding that subproject.</p>
+        technical management. Committers have access to all subproject
+        subversion repositories. Committers may cast binding votes on
+        any technical discussion regarding any subproject.</p>