Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of java.inder@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPn_vTseM_S-eV3niqvXgrrY-_pFpdRdW9wf=4LO7QHpVarBpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7CEACB69-C26A-49A7-8612-9C3B068F083D@hortonworks.com>
	<CC5001C6.5B1C%evans@yahoo-inc.com>
	<CAF-WD4Q=dQYJjEgA_nczAg2rCu5=0g5KVVbJPJ_pvrMLT_A44A@mail.gmail.com>
	<EAB6810C-702B-414C-AC56-1A0102D4802D@hortonworks.com>
	<CAF-WD4Qp5b4H=Ss5ks5srFigL+=DcVPPbSO44sfYP5kA_ANUhg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPn_vTvZEdYJQy7n3rznfLiWhrpYLua+zDMs5g+oLiWOqoTAag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADdVdVGoqQ8TAvge9u_PA5qNqegdKnZUJWnED1zbk+QUGV-LvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<E66C7661-ADAE-4634-9D4D-A8772CC83F8F@jpl.nasa.gov>
	<CAPn_vTucZCcTSMztQvB5ii9THjR=ZYjQ-=8Uv1pjQqfPHJjaUQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<78470082-34F2-4301-B8F2-50F66C073757@jpl.nasa.gov>
	<CAPn_vTs74daUDt0QtWkWabOmFEh8RVEHsEwFNQKSWEuefYtnyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALEq1Z-YSC0fjCXsjhmh91W2ze9GuQF+SbTSSRR--uNQ09O2mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPn_vTuebGq5heCgydJwtkTnmqotsc6Sm3o-qRHyR_2B=eBaBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALEq1Z_v+TY2HxQo0S+iQnDeAgsHVu5SfLDehxhzWotyaT0isw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPn_vTvX=m72TVO=HMwXyRbsvo1Lezw7-jqEDaMosskH1p5OSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<D00D81F4-B12D-4DCC-981C-7B5CBF89E174@hortonworks.com>
	<CAPn_vTseM_S-eV3niqvXgrrY-_pFpdRdW9wf=4LO7QHpVarBpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:13:20 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAGiCgd3nmo2Eaedex0DdLs9wDOCYFYGb5JvsDuyA=_z6mnvy0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Establish YARN as a sub-project of Apache Hadoop
From: "Inder.dev Java" <java.inder@gmail.com>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec550b3ae5fd97904c7f41296

--bcaec550b3ae5fd97904c7f41296
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Vote already started now?
Is this also runs for 7 days?

-thx

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> <vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>> 2. Distinct MR, HDFS and YARN committers
> >>>> 3. Combine MR, YARN, HDFS committers
> >>>
> >>> So we might better just vote on (2)
> >>> versus (3)?
> >>
> >> Works for me.  What do others think?
> >
> > Can you clarify more on what you are proposing we vote on?
> >
> > What does (2) mean?
>
> "Distinct MR, HDFS and YARN committers" means that MR, HDFS, and YARN
> each have their own set of committers. Today we have two sets (MR and
> HDFS) so under this option we would have three sets of committers.
> (And technically a 4th set which is the PMC which is shared across
> sub-projects and can commit to all of them).
>
> > Since (1) was dropped, does it mean we seed the YARN list with folks who
> have been contributing/reviewing patches on YARN?
>
> The vote would need to spell out how we would seed the YARN list. Per
> above I'd suggest seeding it with the current MR committers - ie the
> people who can commit to YARN today - there's no need to actively
> exclude people we already trust to commit to this code, and there's
> obvious downside to excluding them, for example, some patches need to
> span sub-projects (same reason all HDFS/MR committers can commit to
> Common).  If/when the sub-projects become TLPs (ie when there are real
> distinct boundaries between the projects) seems like a good time to
> divvy things up.
>
> Personally I'm in favor of #3, I liked Chris D's original proposal to
> just merge all the committer lists and call it a day!
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>

--bcaec550b3ae5fd97904c7f41296--