From general-return-5053-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 24 11:04:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AEFD976A for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40956 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 11:04:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40695 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 11:04:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40659 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2012 11:04:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:04:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:04:45 +0000 Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so524958vcb.35 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:04:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DVP7Z7FFz5i+U5uOQU/9OgTtUFptffZe7cowiAgMmBQ=; b=zhknlPP+K57i+zfCPQzc9TX5TOLfN9sdSr4k78JrLEhuDM9O150sfqDsME1hMvWiCe CERtC+vtZry/F76IyKK15a1j/+d11hMnoGeeZ1Utq7CU0sjbnMb2Eqj3+a5J9dBP172Z k91IOKKoPppJjAT+NxWUsrnqr6ODEBEe5L+aymqANxxvbb8+TUdPiza/31DrHyhjWZtK sQIX0BfX/Keg7362i5ifyuJltUFABPzuVH8hqd+4MXAbm01IY0FzzQYLtAEC00rnqjFD dB8+vQjb/E1N6bzmOg3Jbmt4xQAZbBuCOztBhEgsXRmUbnTs7Lg0XmS1iy2aAQWR4Tuo 4tsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.91.72 with SMTP id cc8mr1179560vdb.17.1335265464621; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.215.3 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:04:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0C778D4E-7CA1-4A59-B4F5-6FCDF793EA4B@hortonworks.com> <47B96A56-D2AA-490B-A1A1-5B1B3DE7D80C@hortonworks.com> <28404F08-DCE3-4344-BED7-2112431548D1@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:04:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-0.23.2-rc0 From: Thomas Jungblut To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307ca4bab31bbb04be6ab78e --20cf307ca4bab31bbb04be6ab78e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Steve and Eric, sorry to spam your vote thread. Hama is currently in the process of releasing 0.5.0-incubating including Hadoop 1.0 and YARN module with 0.23.1. Let us know if we can check something with 0.23.2. Just post a comment [1]. Thanks and bye. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-431 Am 24. April 2012 12:47 schrieb Steve Loughran : > On 23 April 2012 22:54, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: > > > > > - Are the YARN APIs complete enough? I'd like to see a couple of new > > frameworks implemented to work out the APIs > > -- MPI - A classic with new needs > > -- Maybe supporting HBase as a service within YARN? This will test APIs > > -- Headless Map-Reduce or Pig jobs? One should be able to run them > > without a fat client... > > -- Job history tracking for arbitrary frameworks without new server code > / > > framework? > > > > > -Graphing: Hama & Giraph. these would be ideal as they aren't at 1.x > release stage yet, and because it makes so much sense to run them within > the Hadoop cluster where the data lives. I think Giraph already sneaks in > an an MR job, because the limit on Job Counters in the 1.x branch is > limiting the number of supersteps. > > -I've ported the remote shell app to Groovy, though not actually tested it > yet. What I'd like is to deploy something on every node that can take a > list of nodes and a start time, and trigger an attempt to send data to the > destination -that way you can qualify a cluster's bandwidth. for that I'd > really like a way for any user w/ admin rights to deploy something on a > named machine even if there are no free resources. > -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin --20cf307ca4bab31bbb04be6ab78e--