Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AFC59753 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37940 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 18:43:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37868 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 18:43:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13061 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2012 18:34:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of a.aboelela@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wlLfecdALDg4QsHaj8URfm2FpU6TH4VcYmwjyI3qFoE=; b=QU5IxUF3Kg+cEdWECLyscCbbUg/toMOa8MGcgwW0UOixiNONgr9bA0XqfARjBfYILE kOImdtghKnhml2D2Kx9SHXZQAuXTTypFSdc9aA0pW650XgCQArJNJlXKFh/9uNGRrF2P Q37CaRh44aDKnfhVNfU5yDY61PMVeI/2MZ2SkbQqiyHZDN7LrrCFV2b/kBYNmDdsx6XF Phvm7Eaw0GdRGElD3y9JypMWKdr4ZX3QpjXssGfX1WXaAUZs+YRfTkCcsuPOpMqi/CJU C+gVdS6OuqGjyVfOYqbSpGI/teI6N95D4X524gVRcxUY/HaRJeF4LmxJhCaTrg6KTV2E AHpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8DEB3837-731F-4F42-99A4-8FEA8EABBDBE@hortonworks.com> References: <8DEB3837-731F-4F42-99A4-8FEA8EABBDBE@hortonworks.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:33:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x From: Ahmed Radwan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My vote: 3,2,1,4,5 (non-binding). On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We've discussed several options: > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > thanks, > Arun > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > -- Ahmed