Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5CB2BB9C-A55E-46CE-AC11-FAC07FFF90F4@hortonworks.com>
References: <5CB2BB9C-A55E-46CE-AC11-FAC07FFF90F4@hortonworks.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:58:16 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CADdVdVG6KsRWZcv_7V4BeuhzrCsQbTFz5L9gnhv1+zjCeAKPCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
From: Suresh Srinivas <suresh@hortonworks.com>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d01241fbf2404bba302d9

--20cf307d01241fbf2404bba302d9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

3, 4, 2

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

--20cf307d01241fbf2404bba302d9--